depression (d)

ok.....physics spa is definitely ok..but wonder why can't people just deal with the anomalies as presented on the graphs....this experiment is all about finding the pattern of the dependent variable (new height) given the proportional increase of the independent variable (mass)......i thought that the ruler would bend by approx 0.2-0.3 cm with every additional 50g-mass. luckily did not forget to label the units: ln (d/cm) vs ln (m/g) as well as carry out the experiment twice, in both ascending and descending order like what i did during the past few pracs....almost failed to complete the paper ...well i stated 3 precautions...hope that it will be the bare minimum for any given assessment....ok..as for the given instruction d = Hnought - H1....it must have been quite misleading in a sense given the tight 1hour and the close observation of the invigilators on our set-ups... in order to ln a function, that particular function must satisfy a requirement, that is, to be no lesser than 1!! it's just quite frustrating to have heard of such an erroneous mistake...:(:( depression.......shan't talk about anymore stuffs...today was rather disappointing...but one thing I know, that CERTAIN friendships will be eternal...that's all..good day..tomorrow is rather long day..